Effectiveness and Safety of Topical L-Ascorbic Acid 15% vs Retinol 0.1% for Skin Aging
Introduction
Skin aging results from intrinsic aging and extrinsic factors such as ultraviolet radiation, pollution, and lifestyle habits, leading to wrinkles, pigmentation changes, and reduced skin elasticity. Retinoic acid is a standard anti-aging therapy but is often associated with irritation. L-ascorbic acid (LAA) has antioxidant and collagen-promoting properties and may offer a safer alternative; however, comparative clinical data against retinol are limited.
Aim
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of topical L-ascorbic acid (LAA) 15% serum compared with retinol 0 .1% serum in improving skin aging parameters.
Patient Profile
- Adults aged 35-65 years
- 30 participants enrolled; 27 completed the study and were included in the final analysis.
- Majority were female (86.7%), with the largest age group being 41-45 years (36.7%).
Methods
Study Design
- Randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical trial.
- Simple randomization assigned either LAA or retinol to the right or left side of the face.
- 30 patients were enrolled, 27 completed the study.
Treatment
- One facial side received LAA 15% serum.
- Contralateral facial side received retinol 0.1% serum.
- Follow-up assessments at Week 2 and Week 4.
Study Endpoints
Primary effectiveness assessments
- Modified Dermoscopy Photo Aging Scale (DPAS).
- JANUS-III skin analysis parameters:
- Pores
- Elasticity
- Wrinkles
- Pigmentation
- UV-induced pigmentation
- Skin tone
- Sebum
- Porphyrin
- Moisture
Safety Assessment
- Recording of subjective and objective adverse effects throughout the study.
Results
Baseline DPAS Findings
- Superficial wrinkles were the most common dermoscopic finding.
- Hypo-/hyperpigmented macules were frequently observed.
No participants presented with yellowish discoloration, yellowish papules, or criss-cross wrinkles
Figure 1: Most prevalent photoaging features at baseline using DPAS
Modified DPAS Outcomes
- Both treatments significantly improved photoaging scores (Modified DPAS) from baseline.
- LAA 15% serum: Significant improvement at Week 2 (p=0.005) and Week 4 (p=0.002).
- Retinol 0.1% serum: Significant improvement at Week 2 (p=0.022) and Week 4 (p=0.040).
- No significant difference was observed between LAA and retinol in DPAS scores at baseline (p=0.708), Week 2 (p=1.000), or Week 4 (p=0.749).
Table 1. Comparison of DPAS Scores Between Treatment Groups
|
Time Point |
LAA Median (IQR) |
Retinol Median (IQR) |
p-value |
|
Week 0 |
2 (1-4) |
2 (1-4) |
0.708 |
|
Week 2 |
2 (1-3) |
2 (1-3) |
1.000 |
|
Week 4 |
2 (1-4) |
2 (1-3) |
0.749 |
DPAS = Dermoscopy Photo Aging Scale; IQR = interquartile range.
JANUS-III Outcomes
Significant Changes from Baseline to Week 4
LAA Group
Pigmentation, UV pigmentation, and sebum levels increased significantly (p=0.004, p<0.001, and p=0.005, respectively).
Retinol Group
Pigmentation, UV pigmentation, sebum and porphyrin levels increased significantly (p=0.009, p<0.001, p=0.001, and p=0.025 respectively),
Table 2: Comparison of JANUS-III Parameters on Week 4 Between LAA and Retinol Groups
|
Parameter |
LAA |
Retinol |
p-value |
|
Pores |
46.63 |
46.59 |
0.985 |
|
Elasticity |
57.07 |
57.11 |
0.994 |
|
Wrinkles |
16.15 |
14.93 |
0.496 |
|
Pigmentation |
27.15 |
27.0 (10.0) |
0.788 |
|
UV Pigmentation |
19.44 |
21.26 |
0.467 |
|
Skin Tone |
50.70 |
51.1 |
0.673 |
|
Sebum |
193.0 (294.0) |
276.0 (416.0) |
0.115 |
|
Porphyrin |
28.30 |
28.30 |
1.000 |
|
Moisture |
25.67 |
25.52 |
0.944 |
JANUS-III data are reported as mean or median (IQR).
Safety
- Adverse effects occurred in 5 of 27 participants, including stinging and itching with LAA and stinging with retinol.
- All events were mild, self-limiting, required no treatment, and resolved within 24 hours.
Conclusion
- Topical L-ascorbic acid 15% serum demonstrated anti-aging efficacy comparable to retinol 0.1%, with similar improvements in DPAS or JANUS-III outcomes.
- Compared with retinol, L-ascorbic acid showed superior tolerability, making it a suitable option for patients with sensitive skin, barrier dysfunction, rosacea, inflammatory dermatoses, pregnancy considerations, or retinoid intolerance.
- Considering its efficacy, safety, patient acceptance, and real-world feasibility, L-ascorbic acid represents a rational and accessible option for both initial and maintenance anti-aging therapy
Reference
Dermatol Rep. 2026 doi: 10.4081/dr.2026.10293









